Sitemind demonstration. Representative project data, not a client project.
Input: the subcontract and its schedule of rates, the payment claim, previous claims, the approved variation register. Output: three items for review, each with the page.
| Line | Description | Qty | Rate | This claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rough-in, levels 1 to 3 | 3 | $18,200 | $54,600 |
| 2 | Cable trays, level 2 | 240 m | $92 | $22,080 |
| 3 | Switchboard relocation, variation | 1 | $14,850 | $14,850 |
| 4 | Distribution boards, level 1 | 4 | $2,100 | $8,400 |
| 5 | Lighting, level 1 | 1 | $84,370 | $84,370 |
| Total this claim | $184,300 | |||
Subcontract SC-018, 62 pages, schedule of rates p. 17. Claims 1 to 6. Variation register, 41 entries.
Switchboard relocation. Not found in the approved variation register. Raised in site meeting 14 as rejected pending approval.
Variation register, 41 entries, no match. Minutes 14, decision 2.Distribution boards, level 1. Four units claimed. Four units already claimed and certified in claim 5, line 4.
Claim 5, line 4, certified 28 July.Cable tray rate differs from the schedule of rates. Schedule shows $84 / m. Difference on this claim: $1,920.
Subcontract SC-018, schedule of rates, p. 17.Lines 1 and 5 match the schedule, quantities and previous claims. Cleared for certification.
The QS or CA makes the decision. Sitemind certifies nothing.
When a line cannot be matched with confidence, it is sent for review with the reason, not guessed. On a real deployment of the accounts clerk, 69 of 1,641 invoices went that way. See the figures.