Sitemind demonstration. Representative project data, not a client project.

Ask the project. Get the source.

Input: emails, RFIs, meeting minutes, drawings, contracts, project documents. Output: an answer with every source attached, or "Not in record".

#level-3-towerSynced 07:40
Has the architect confirmed the revised façade detail?

Yes. The architect confirmed the revised detail by email on 17 August. Drawing A-402 Rev C was issued on 19 August. RFI 147 on the waterproofing interface remains open, consultant response overdue since 2 September.

Email, architect, 17 AugA-402 Rev C, 19 AugRFI 147, open
What commitments were made this week that still don't have a closed action?

Three. Dave to confirm the pump for Thursday's pour, no confirmation on record. Mark to chase the waterproofing consultant on RFI 147, no correspondence since. Sarah's response to the electrical sub on the switchboard variation, drafted, not sent.

Minutes 14, actions 1 and 3Outbox, draft 20 SeptRFI 147 log
What did we agree on liquidated damages?

$2,500 a calendar day from the Date for Practical Completion, capped at 10% of the contract sum. The date moved to 14 November by EOT 6.

Head contract cl. 34.7, p. 48EOT 6 approval
Did the fire engineer sign off on the level 3 penetrations?

Not in record. No certificate, email or inspection note from the fire engineer mentions level 3 penetrations. The last fire engineer document is the level 2 certificate, 4 August.

Searched: 18,400 emails, 412 sheets, 61 documents

What it reads

  • Email, the whole project inbox
  • RFIs and their responses
  • Meeting minutes and recordings
  • Drawings, every revision
  • Contracts and variations
  • Procore records

What it never does

  • Guess when the record is silent
  • Send anything
  • Change a record

"Not in record" is an answer. It is often the most useful one.

Bring one question

We connect one project and you ask it, live.

Book a discovery call